And that's the reason ancap is Proglite to me. it assumes a unversalist ethos as a starting point.
-
-
Replying to @Saradin1337 @helios_unbound
AnCap (alone) sets itself the task of thinking distributed security. Worth giving it the benefit of the doubt.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @helios_unbound
Yeah, pocket nukes and all that. But
@mylittlepwnies3 is right that superweapons we can't even fathom are next1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Saradin1337 @Outsideness and
No way to ensure global stability if 100-or even 200 people can end the world in a day.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
If several hundred (uncoordinated) people can end the world in a day ...
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @Saradin1337 and
... then AnCap actually has a chance.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Maybe. But this is like MAD, assumes similar levels of rationality.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Consider it hot-house rationality training.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
I don't think you can train a clannish society of 85 IQers to think rationally
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
No one cares about 85 IQers. They're not serious players.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.