Crypto-locks/etc might be useful to a sovereign securing power, etc, but not as checks on sovereign power.
-
-
Replying to @mr_scientism
This discussion gets tripped up on a scaling problem. Why is the national sovereign given magical powers? ...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @mr_scientism
... Every level of sovereignty is in reality challenged from 'above' and 'below' -- there's no Messianic King. ...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @mr_scientism
... "All constitutions of sovereignty below the level of the national sovereign should unilaterally disarm themselves." ...
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
This is the very goal of leadership. Disarm and unify those below you. The point is to keep it as a goal.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mr_scientism
"Disarm and unify those below you." -- How is that not the Democratic Party platform?
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @Outsideness
Identity politics is pretty obviously arm and dis-unify, as is democracy.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mr_scientism
"Screw the Second Amendment and bless the Union" -- the remaining attribution is hazy reactionary metaphor.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
Ah, I didn't realise you were using "disarm" so literally and narrowly to begin with. I was talking about power centres.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mr_scientism
Is there a difference in principle that I'm missing? It looks like a smooth continuum to me.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
... "Sub- 'govermental' units of partial sovereignty SHOULD surrender all capacity to resist the Union." [*snork*]
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.