Despite the obnoxious crankiness, Reactionary Future is making an important point, and it is Moldbuggian: https://reactionaryfuture.wordpress.com/2016/05/12/constitutional-sovcorp-what/ … ...
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness
... The problem with his (splenetic) assertion is that he assumes 'Secure Power' is a relatively straightforward notion. ...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
... It's Moldbug's Fnargl -- and that was a science fiction scenario. What would the reality be like? CB doesn't recognize the question. ...
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
Crypto-locks/etc might be useful to a sovereign securing power, etc, but not as checks on sovereign power.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mr_scientism
This discussion gets tripped up on a scaling problem. Why is the national sovereign given magical powers? ...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @mr_scientism
... Every level of sovereignty is in reality challenged from 'above' and 'below' -- there's no Messianic King. ...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @mr_scientism
... "All constitutions of sovereignty below the level of the national sovereign should unilaterally disarm themselves." ...
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
This is the very goal of leadership. Disarm and unify those below you. The point is to keep it as a goal.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
If it all comes down to exhortation, there's not much there.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.