Despite the obnoxious crankiness, Reactionary Future is making an important point, and it is Moldbuggian: https://reactionaryfuture.wordpress.com/2016/05/12/constitutional-sovcorp-what/ … ...
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness
... The problem with his (splenetic) assertion is that he assumes 'Secure Power' is a relatively straightforward notion. ...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
... It's Moldbug's Fnargl -- and that was a science fiction scenario. What would the reality be like? CB doesn't recognize the question. ...
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
... Moldbug explores it, venturing into the crypto-locked security architecture speculations (which have invited so much trite derision). ..
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Outsideness
... CB merely assumes it as an arbitrarily rejected political option, oblivious to its identity with the notion of a Messianic Kingdom. ...
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
... A God-King would be untroubled by political disturbance. Certainly. That doesn't actually constitute a practical remedy to anything. ...
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
... How can primary (or 'sovereign') property secure itself, near absolutely? Furious affirmation isn't going to establish it. ...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Outsideness
... Ironically, given CB's utter contempt for all innovations in 'protocol governance', Bitcoin has done most to advance this question. ...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
... It establishes principles of propertarian security that can be demonstrably realized. No charismatic leader gets close, or could. ...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
... Sadly, this is most likely a discussion that will probably not happen, and technical facts-on-the-ground will do all the work.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.