@MichaelPascal21 All that because they're inefficient commies. Credible deterrent capability fully suffices. Singapore does fine.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @MichaelPascal21
@MichaelPascal21 Your definition of sovereignty is analytically locked into autarkic socialism, and thus useless for Anglos.2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @MichaelPascal21
@MichaelPascal21 Yes. He's an interesting guy, but of course it's a definitive anti-Anglo political-economic ideology. (I'm with the Whigs.)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @MichaelPascal21
@MichaelPascal21 No, it's anti-Anglo because it's a loser ideology (suited to societies unable to implement capitalism at maximum intensity)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @MichaelPascal21
@MichaelPascal21 Sure. There is only war. I'm only saying that Anglos should avoid List-style policy recommendations like the plague.7 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@MichaelPascal21 Once they take that path, they've formally joined the losers club. Time to look elsewhere for the edge of the process.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.