The ideological heterogeneity of white populations means that the political effects of ethnic separation would be likely to disappoint them.
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness
... Unless geopolitical fragmentation works as a motor of ideological selection, it leaves its animating conflicts essentially unresolved.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
... WNs (for non-random e.g.) want political entities that are committed to identitarian principles. Racial selection won't do that. ...
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
... If the goal is a White Identitarian state, it needs to select for identitarianism, far more than for whiteness. ...
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
... Only 16% of White Americans say their racial identity is "very important" to them. https://today.yougov.com/news/2016/01/29/racial-attitudes-differ-ideology-class/ … ...
5 replies 2 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
... But then, if demographic selection is primarily ideological, the entire framework of WN political strategy is subverted at the root. ...
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
... Separating Right from Left is the critical secessionist objective (this will, of course, have massive 'disparate impact'). ...
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness Correct. White segregation is an inevitable outcome, but an insufficient starting place.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@MaiLaDreapta Not an "inevitable outcome" for every Right-oriented Patch, surely? Rigid racial segregation is historically highly anomalous.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.