Why is Pan-Secessionism not vastly more widely endorsed? It offers a flexible solution to almost every political problem. ...
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness
... Take the Caplan (radical open-borders) case. Even those who think it's nuts could surely be persuaded to let it happen somewhere. ...
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Outsideness
... Break the habit of general ideological solutions. Work instead towards pragmatically disintegrated geopolitical arrangements. ...
2 replies 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness it's (by its own lights) passing off uncontrollable/-generalizable (adaptation to) geopol catabolism as ideological realization2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @______138190
@276039081 Isn't it simply a diplomatic equilibrium? ...
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness among ideological sub-splinter-communities, lol?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @______138190
@276039081 ... All geopolitical powers are microscopic sub-splinters until they hit the threshold of auto-catalysis. Chaos reigns.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness nah, that's only half - & still only formally - of the process. You absolutely need extrinsic catalysis from hegemon catabolism1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
-
-
-
Replying to @______138190
@276039081 (That was meant to be a technical summary of your previous tweet.)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.