@curtdoolittle @ne0colonial @Nick_B_Steves ... Satoshi Nakamoto's argument against 'Trusted Third Parties' for e.g. is rigorously critical.
-
-
@Outsideness@curtdoolittle@Nick_B_Steves The actual abolition of commons would entail a return to barbarianism, possibly pre-sentience. -
@ne0colonial@curtdoolittle@Nick_B_Steves Once you have the concept of sovereign (or primary) property, 'the commons' is a redundancy.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@Outsideness@curtdoolittle@Nick_B_Steves Interesting. I perceive NRx at heart as a drive for increasing the value of the commons. - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@Outsideness@curtdoolittle@Nick_B_Steves alternatively I could put it : maximise value of commons through holding commons privately. -
@ne0colonial@curtdoolittle@Nick_B_Steves Depending what "holding commons privately" meant, perhaps it could be workable.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.