@Nick_B_Steves Kristor is often extremely interesting, but he hasn't a clue about the steps infidels find unpersuasive. I mean, 13 -> 14 ...
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness
@Nick_B_Steves ... I realize it's not meant to be humorous ...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Nick_B_Steves The logical compulsion is roughly comparable to: Stuff is -> (ergo) God exists and sent his only son to die for man's sins ..3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness@Nick_B_Steves I am a full on Catholic who was once a proto-Bright atheist. I find all "proofs" of God dubious at best.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP
@Outsideness@Nick_B_Steves I consider God to be one of those things that Godel's proof points to: true, but not provable w/i system.2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP
@MorlockP@Nick_B_Steves Seems to me Occidental Monotheism should admit that it's chatty. Every step was based on a communication event. ...1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@MorlockP@Nick_B_Steves ... If God talks to you, and passes whatever demon-screen tests you consider appropriate, go for it. ...3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
@MorlockP @Nick_B_Steves ... But to suggest you can derive a personal God from philosophical first principles is absolutely deluded.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.