@ClarkHat @Outsideness Confused b/c nothing I've read in MM explains how exit would be preserved in moral-neutral way.
-
-
Replying to @TimSEsq
@TimSEsq@ClarkHat Your asking for a super-ordinate Exit supervisor. That's the same erroneous path@slatestarcodex goes down. ...2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness@ClarkHat@slatestarcodex Why would tyrant allow exit if able to prevent it? Why would tyrant accept undesirable exiles?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TimSEsq
@TimSEsq@ClarkHat@slatestarcodex There are two mutually exclusive choices for controlling a tyrant: (a) a meta-tyrant, (b) exit pressure.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@TimSEsq@ClarkHat@slatestarcodex ... The attempt by a tyrant to prevent Exit becomes an intolerable resource drain in itself. ...2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness Want to go back to exit. You talk abt drain of preventing exit. I read MM as predicting all patches will voluntarily allow exit2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness There's also a historical trend away from kinds of gov MM predicts / desires for patches.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@TimSEsq ... but there are numerous reasons to anticipate one, including deterritorialization of capital, and rise of robotic warfare.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@TimSEsq A well-placed island, zero capital taxes, a flotilla of intelligent combat drones, and a few million Chinese, and you're set up.
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness@TimSEsq expansion of conflict into virtual territories is an interesting counter to distance not being the defense it once was0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.