This is reasonable, but quite arbitrary, and not a great way to build institutional credibility: http://www.hestiasociety.org/site/library-of-nrx/the-neoreactionary-canon/ …
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness
It should start with Moldbug, and then -- very conservatively -- add supplements based on clear criteria (systematic principles). ...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Outsideness
There's no sign of that yet. To suggest that such a list is authoritative is merely politics, and not in a good way.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
It's far too easily dismissed as a personal promotion exercise. It would be far better to strip it right down to MM, and start over.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Outsideness
(People deciding on their own canonicity naturally provokes laughter.)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Some historical study of canon formation would have been appropriate. (This isn't the way you do it.)
1:16 AM - 6 Jun 2015
1 reply
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.