@Outsideness Not really. They attain their meaning when used in particular context within particular discourse.
-
-
Replying to @BerlinianFox
@BerlinianFox 'Discrimination' as a political hate word means basic cognitive functions have no legitimate application to people.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@BerlinianFox "In my experience, people with swastikas tattooed on their foreheads are trouble." Ah, that one's still OK -- as it should be.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness higher cog. function would tell you that "therefore all ppl with swastikas on their foreheads are trouble" is fallacious.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BerlinianFox
@BerlinianFox You don't run your own business, do you?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @BerlinianFox
@BerlinianFox Inescapably amused by the thought of your swastika-tattooed front desk guy. (Who I'm sure is actually nice and misunderstood.)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness Could be Hindu. See how assumptions run wild.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @BerlinianFox
@BerlinianFox Have you ever seen a Hindu with a swastika tattooed on their forehead? I lived in India for six months, and never did.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness So? Being outside the realm of your experience doesn't make it outside the realm if possibility.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@BerlinianFox No, it adjusts Bayesian priors. Which is the best anyone can do. (I'd get company PR working on the Manson-cultist angle.)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.