@NIOReaction @soapjackal What are you counter-posing to social contract theories?
@mr_scientism @NIOReaction @soapjackal Who's pretending that? Jim's analysis is tooted in the evo-psych of social animals. ...
-
-
@mr_scientism @NIOReaction@soapjackal ... There's no libertarian metaphysics assumed at all. Simply inclinations to permissible retaliation -
@mr_scientism @NIOReaction@soapjackal [Goddamn Twitter incontinence -- 'tooted' is of course 'rooted']
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@Outsideness @NIOReaction@soapjackal Evo-psych often makes the same mistake: using rationalistic language at too low a level.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Outsideness @NIOReaction@soapjackal Jim says he's going to define natural law in 'value free' terms but uses 'reasonably' multiple times.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Outsideness @NIOReaction@soapjackal Relying on this kind of (implicit) reasoning or negotiation is a category mistake.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Outsideness @NIOReaction@soapjackal Aristotelian-Thomistic natural law doesn't have the same problem: teleology is directly perceived.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Outsideness @NIOReaction@soapjackal But natural rights, social contract theory, etc, is overly rationalistic and voluntarist. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.