@CarlosEstebanRD @_Hurlock_ @AnarchoPapist @Nick_B_Steves It's perverse, certainly.
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness @_Hurlock_@AnarchoPapist@Nick_B_Steves Forget "thinking" for a moment. Can a machine PREFFER? Enjoy?2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @CarlosEstebanRD
@CarlosEstebanRD @_Hurlock_@AnarchoPapist@Nick_B_Steves Animal brains demonstrate the fact, unless you doubt preferences are neurological.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Outsideness
@CarlosEstebanRD @_Hurlock_@AnarchoPapist@Nick_B_Steves ... Nothing especially metaphysically significant about protein, is there?2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness @_Hurlock_@AnarchoPapist@Nick_B_Steves irony of discussing metaphysics using materialist empirical ontology2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @soapjackal
@Outsideness @_Hurlock_@AnarchoPapist@Nick_B_Steves I mean honestly from a metaphysical perspective much of science is unverifiable1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @soapjackal
@Outsideness @_Hurlock_@AnarchoPapist@Nick_B_Steves and relies on a purely utilitarian proof instead of any consistent philosophical one1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @soapjackal
@soapjackal @_Hurlock_@AnarchoPapist@Nick_B_Steves Technology envelops philosophy (on the hypothesis that machines think).1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness @_Hurlock_@AnarchoPapist@Nick_B_Steves why?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @soapjackal
@soapjackal @_Hurlock_@AnarchoPapist@Nick_B_Steves Because thinking is subordinated to an engineering problem.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@soapjackal @_Hurlock_ @AnarchoPapist @Nick_B_Steves (Humans will stick with romance to the bitter end though -- probably any species would)
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.