@nydwracu ... kind of implies there's a problem with Marxism other than the criticism of capitalism. Is there?
-
-
-
Replying to @bitemyapp
@Outsideness@nydwracu epistemically unsound, among other things.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp
@Outsideness@nydwracu in fact, I think Marx (not MarxISM) is mostly interesting as a companion introduction to capitalism alongside Smith.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @bitemyapp
@Outsideness@nydwracu the labor theory of value, neo-platonian stuff, epistemic bounds overstepping, dialectic, etc. are uninteresting.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp
@bitemyapp@nydwracu "Uninteresting" is something of a weak tea criticism. It's clearly been interesting to a lot of people.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness@nydwracu I really need to go to bed, but I know you know why stuff like labor theory of value is absurd.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp
@bitemyapp@nydwracu ... but Marx inherited the LTV from classical political economy, and systematized it into a reductio.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness@nydwracu stripping all humanity and subtlety from something is a good way to make it meaningless to humanity.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@bitemyapp @nydwracu Similarly, stripping the chimpanzeeness out of something makes it uninteresting to chimps.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.