Deeply insightful remark by @Nick_B_Steves on the 8chan neoreaction thread:
https://8chan.co/pol/res/34444.html#q35550 …
-
-
@existoon
@Nick_B_Steves Parties are (hopefully) not ever going to be an NRx development.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness @existoon@Nick_B_Steves What about one-party-states? In these, is there a distinction between the party and the state?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ja_wentworth
@Outsideness @existoon@Nick_B_Steves We're against politics but not ideology. How about a non-political party to guard ideology?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ja_wentworth
@Outsideness @existoon@Nick_B_Steves Neoreaction supports pluralism, lots of research centres, but the state will still have an ideology.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Replying to @Nick_B_Steves
@Nick_B_Steves @ja_wentworth @existoon Civic pluralism is entirely consistent with this.
5:31 PM - 23 Sep 2014
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.