@Nick_B_Steves @Outsideness @mtpollack That's an excellent way to define the political poles so none are inherently wrong.
-
-
Replying to @Alrenous
@Nick_B_Steves@Outsideness@mtpollack Progressive: priority is growth. Conservative: p. avoiding damage. Reactionary: reversing damage.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Alrenous
@Nick_B_Steves@Outsideness@mtpollack Neoreactionary: damage is irreversible and unavoidable, and prog. change always been entropic.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @Alrenous
@Alrenous@Nick_B_Steves@Outsideness@mtpollack N: getting pretty warm around here, where'd i put my fiddle?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Nick_B_Steves
@Nick_B_Steves@mr_archenemy@Outsideness@mtpollack 333 is a superset of P, C, and R. The ontological commitments obscure your priority.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Alrenous
@Nick_B_Steves@mr_archenemy@Outsideness@mtpollack For example I'm actually an anti-Progressive progressive. Build or bust. Build or die.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Alrenous
@Alrenous@Nick_B_Steves@Outsideness@mtpollack I like building a lot more than conserving, or hastening collapse.2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
@mr_archenemy @Alrenous @Nick_B_Steves @mtpollack Build weapons. Then you win both ways.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.