Stupid monsters: http://www.xenosystems.net/stupid-monsters/ … (If we find it possible to believe in paperclippers, we're in serious trouble.)
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness I fail to understand where you actaully discount potential non-will-to-think cognition? Are stock bots will-to-thinkers?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @david_kenneth_d
@david_kenneth_d Is anyone calling a stock bot a 'super-intelligence'?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness It seems you're basically saying these is no chinese room capable of such, without will-to-think cogs.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @david_kenneth_d
@Outsideness Even if a super-AI is cogniscient philosophically of things, it doesn't have to ever care, even for it self.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Replying to @david_kenneth_d
@david_kenneth_d That depends on the semantics of "care". It has to work upon itself just to work, which is 'care' as a practical reality.
9:07 AM - 25 Aug 2014
1 reply
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.