@GabrielDuquette @Outsideness @thesublemon @nydwracu So I believe the case where something sheerℓy pointless can be thrilling; past that
-
-
Replying to @blue_traveler
@GabrielDuquette@Outsideness@thesublemon@nydwracu it seems like a semantic disagreement about "utility"1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @blue_traveler
@blue_traveler@GabrielDuquette@thesublemon@nydwracu No, it's an orgy of slave morality.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness I don't really get it, but I lack your perspective.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @blue_traveler
@blue_traveler I'm stunned it's so counter-intuitive. If someone said "the purpose of Jesus is to make people feel good about themselves" ..1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@blue_traveler ... I'd expect it be met with articulate outrage. Why is "art serves a social purpose" any different?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@blue_traveler Society exists for the sake of art, not the other way around.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness …Orthogonal to neocameralism, implicit, or conflicting?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@blue_traveler I'd prefer Neocameral Realism to Socialist Realism as an aesthetic slave morality, but not by a huge amount.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.