@Outsideness @nydwracu This is dualism too. Survival is not success. It is a prerequisite to success, but not identical.
-
-
Replying to @Alrenous1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
-
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness@nydwracu Yes? If there's a difference, you'll have to explain it. Dire apes have goals. Need to live to pursue them.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness@nydwracu A dire ape wants paperclips. It lives a long, paper-clip devoid life. It regrets surviving. See also: incels.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness@nydwracu Then, if I understand correctly, an evil empire can lose even if it exterminates all competitors.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness@nydwracu Too easy? If you don't even survive it can't be success. If life wasn't worth living, it wouldn't be an evil empire.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness
@Alrenous@nydwracu In our case, Jim's "killer apes". There's clearly a latent herbivorous critique of actually-existing sapient life.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Alrenous@nydwracu It seems to me that the herbivorous critique is discredited by reality, more than the hunters are by moral theory.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.