@Outsideness @nydwracu I constitutionally have to axiomatically believe power != goodness.
Wisdom is power, goodness isn't necessarily wise
-
-
Replying to @Alrenous
@Outsideness@nydwracu Might is not right. But it would be nice if goodness would realize that right isn't might, either.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Alrenous@nydwracu That's to say, close up, the inequality is indisputable, but as you pan out it becomes much more questionable.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
Alrenous Retweeted Alrenous
@Outsideness@nydwracu Hey man, I think I can prove and detail objective morality. https://twitter.com/Alrenous/status/475302402241732608 … So, you know, about that.Alrenous added,
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness@nydwracu Might = can. Right = right. You can be correct but unlucky. Ad baculum is still a fallacy. Still epistemically bad.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness@nydwracu Is good just a kind of material prudence? As in, empires collapse because they're bad therefore they rot?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Alrenous
@Outsideness@nydwracu In my view, good can only gain might because people like good and thus cooperate. There is no direct material benefit1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.