@soapjackal @Outsideness @amerika_blog
Sounds like a big fight over the 'originality premium' nothing's great in modernity unless original.
-
-
Replying to @Aristokles11235
@Aristokles11235@soapjackal@amerika_blog Some things are new. I defer to no one in my reverance for Anaximander or Pyrrho ...1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Aristokles11235@soapjackal@amerika_blog ... but it would be silly to pretend to find rigorous Neocameralist theory in either.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness@soapjackal@amerika_blog If neo-cameralism is truly new please discourage all these attempts to find precursors thru history.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Aristokles11235
@Aristokles11235@soapjackal@amerika_blog Every innovation has precursors. That's what a precursor is.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness@amerika_blog was correct.The singular emphasis on the distribution of property as key puts you closer to Marx than Tradition.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Aristokles11235
@Aristokles11235@amerika_blog The phrase "distribution of property" is highly ambiguous. (Sounds like socialism to me.) ...3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @amerika_blog
@amerika_blog@Aristokles11235 If there's anything the tech-comms are NOT trying to do it's "regulate distribution". (This is getting silly)1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness@amerika_blog If controlling the state as a private monopoly isn't a form of controlling distribution I don't know what is.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Aristokles11235 @amerika_blog It looks like that because you're not approaching it through the Patchwork (which is anti-monopoly in-itself)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.