@Aristokles11235 @soapjackal @amerika_blog ... but it would be silly to pretend to find rigorous Neocameralist theory in either.
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness@soapjackal@amerika_blog If neo-cameralism is truly new please discourage all these attempts to find precursors thru history.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Aristokles11235
@Aristokles11235@soapjackal@amerika_blog Every innovation has precursors. That's what a precursor is.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness@amerika_blog was correct.The singular emphasis on the distribution of property as key puts you closer to Marx than Tradition.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Aristokles11235
@Aristokles11235@amerika_blog The phrase "distribution of property" is highly ambiguous. (Sounds like socialism to me.) ...3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Aristokles11235@amerika_blog ... Key point is formalism. Romantics don't like it. That's why they can't lift their thinking out of fuzz.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness@amerika_blog Formalism alone has never been enough to ensure the order of a polity for any considerable length of time.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Aristokles11235
@Aristokles11235@amerika_blog There's nothing theory can do to "ensure the order of a polity for any considerable length of time."1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness@Aristokles11235@amerika_blog You need value-generating institutions. The question is whether markets alone are sufficient.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ProfessorZaius
@ProfessorZaius@Aristokles11235@amerika_blog When I hear "value-generating institutions" I reach for my Exit option. ...3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@ProfessorZaius @Aristokles11235 @amerika_blog ... which isn't to say I'm necessarily going to use it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.