@Alrenous You can't measure or count it, application of any kind of maths seems difficult ... I'm not seeing how this research moves forward
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness Physics is made of math. Consciousness is made of logic.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness My proof implies that intensive is not quantitative, which is why it's intractable. Go qualitative, get traction.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness Normally I would agree. In this case I think agnosticism is required. Is stronger anger more intense in the same way as light?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Alrenous
@Outsideness It seems normally ordinality is cardinality+ignorance. Light. Pressure. Earthquakes. Can't think of a counter-example.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Alrenous
@Outsideness So no, anger does not have to be ordinal. Has to be not-ordinal, actually. The relationship is similar, but not the same.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Alrenous
@Outsideness Actually, left to myself, I would steal intensity for qualia. We call bright light more intense because the associated quale1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Alrenous
@Outsideness is more intense than for dim light. The light itself isn't more intense - it's just more numerous.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness Well that's flattering, thanks. Do you keep an actual list somewhere?0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.