@CineRobert @Outsideness
Was disagreeing w/ the "or nothing."
It's difficult but not impossible to be more than a 'meat puppet' , yes?
-
-
Replying to @Aristokles11235
@Aristokles11235@CineRobert That would have to be the transcendental part (in some way being time, rather than being in time).2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness@Aristokles11235@CineRobert referencing to the Transcendent from the POV of still being grounded in Self seems fallacious. :)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KalishJantzen
@KalishJantzen@Aristokles11235@CineRobert (the transcendental is not transcendent (confusing I know, it's a German thing))1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness@Aristokles11235@CineRobert yes. Being transcendental is w'in our grasp. Transcendent is beyond the scope of conscious mind.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@KalishJantzen @Aristokles11235 @CineRobert You'd have to say the Transcendental is ineluctable for us (acc. Kant), because what we are.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.