@AnarchoPapist @sarahdoingthing A logic that leads to children as common property, no?
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness@AnarchoPapist wise and sane people husbandry requires a BIT of common control of reproduction, no?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@Outsideness@AnarchoPapist "population policy" is a human universal, well except moderns...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing@AnarchoPapist Really? I don't see much 'policy' of any kind before the moderns.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness@AnarchoPapist selective infanticide, no raising twins, etc. - groups know how big they can afford to be.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing@AnarchoPapist But it's entirely retrospective to evaluate such cultural practices as 'policy' (or 'knowing') isn't it?1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@sarahdoingthing@AnarchoPapist Trying to do culture deliberately rarely works. (I'm not saying that's a good thing, just a thing.)1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness It's an important point that social technology does not need to travel with a full understanding of why it works.1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@Outsideness Most of our social techs are Chesterton's fences. But I think Murdock is making a functional claim about behaviors.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
@sarahdoingthing True enough, but then if we're talking about implementing social technology / new Chesterton fences, it matters a lot.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.