Thanks to science, most of us accept the deep past – so why are our imagined futures so shallow? http://aeonm.ag/1geofCk
-
-
Replying to @aeonmag
@aeonmag@Outsideness Either there is no future (flat spacetime) xor there's no future /yet/ (indeterminism, multiverse, Copenhagen QM).1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @syntaxfree
@syntaxfree@aeonmag If the nature of time is not itself in time, the future cannot be less real than the past.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness@aeonmag Note that I wasn'tstating that there is no future, only that there are eminently sensible worldviews where that's true1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @syntaxfree
@syntaxfree @aeonmag Yes, and my response also contains a questionable hypothetical -- which, if rejected, opens into deeper perplexities.
4:45 AM - 10 Feb 2014
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.