Thanks to science, most of us accept the deep past – so why are our imagined futures so shallow? http://aeonm.ag/1geofCk
@syntaxfree @aeonmag If the nature of time is not itself in time, the future cannot be less real than the past.
-
-
@Outsideness@aeonmag Note that I wasn'tstating that there is no future, only that there are eminently sensible worldviews where that's true -
@syntaxfree@aeonmag Yes, and my response also contains a questionable hypothetical -- which, if rejected, opens into deeper perplexities.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.