If (scientific orthodoxy) the laws of nature transcend time, then eternity is real, and 'providence' has not been dissolved as a problem.
@mr_archenemy What is time as such? That's already to connect with eternity (time itself didn't in any intelligible sense 'begin' or 'end').
-
-
@Outsideness our inability to see ahead. "front" and "back" work just as well in considering spacetime obj from perspective of inhabitants -
@mr_archenemy I'm being chucked out of the bar (and off the computer), so time wins this one ... - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@Outsideness "inside" time perception/memory points in one direction, presumably "outside" lacks that constraint? begin/end falls out ofThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.