@MikeAnissimov @AnarchoPapist Winning at chicken requires serious non-seriousness (and winning is serious).
@MikeAnissimov @AnarchoPapist It compromises command-control, by inserting cryptic defection problems.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@MikeAnissimov@AnarchoPapist That's by no means obvious. Showing willingness to go to the edge with UFAI might be the only way to win.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@MikeAnissimov@AnarchoPapist You've decided Lovecraft isn't serious, even after comprehending the Basilisk, which is odd.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@AnarchoPapist@MikeAnissimov Materialism is a demonstrated driver for memetic virulence (at least within advanced modernity).Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@AnarchoPapist@MikeAnissimov@Nick_B_Steves For this topic, I think non-causal decision theories are the stumbling blocks for people. -
@AnarchoPapist@MikeAnissimov@Nick_B_Steves It begins to get weird after this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newcomb%27s_paradox …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.