@tipsfromkatee i'm not sure. maybe: people who weren't aligned with the cathedral, but also not in NR, felt comfortable discussing it
-
-
Replying to @raptros_
@tipsfromkatee i.e. without considering what effect discussing it would have on the status of their own communities1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee i don't see a way to do that; i suspect that there isn't. enabling internal criticism is probably a better route.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @raptros_
@tipsfromkatee (this is why i encourage the development of groupings by schools of thought within the neoreaction. it'll take time though)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee@raptros_ Naming things sharpens cultural conflict, which in turn toughens people up.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness@tipsfromkatee also, maybe we can take advantage of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_versioning …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @raptros_
@Outsideness@tipsfromkatee what i want, though, is to enable conflict along lines that don't involve battling over the word "neoreaction"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @raptros_
@raptros_@tipsfromkatee Fights over totemic words generate exceptional levels of memetic virulence, because they induce slogan compression.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@raptros_ @tipsfromkatee We should fight over everything, right down to punctuation marks.
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness@raptros_ when you identify with words, you don't just get fights about words, you get fights between words3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@Outsideness@raptros_ no matter which word wins, it means you get ruled by a word. words are like lizards that way.0 replies 1 retweet 1 like
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.