Are there non-sentimental reasons for thinking that any church today is a reactionary institution? (Or even a mildly conservative one?)
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Nick_B_Steves
@Nick_B_Steves An institution can be reactionary if it tends inherently to shrug off modifications incompatible with its original purposes.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Nick_B_Steves
@Nick_B_Steves Is it a strength or a weakness of such arguments that they are entirely secular or even naturalistic in character?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Nick_B_Steves
@Nick_B_Steves Sure. If there's anything I'm over-estimating, it's not the institutional infrastructure, but the metaphysical sincerity.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness@Nick_B_Steves is Pope Francis an atomic anomalous monist given his background in chemistry? We've strayed from phenomenology.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@MattOlver @Nick_B_Steves A chemist? That's a relief. I'd mistaken him for a community activist.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.