@MikeAnissimov @DocCLAR Unless the urge for status scales linearly, this strikes me as more of a neat fencing move than a step forwards.
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness
@MikeAnissimov @DocCLAR Capitalism is a social machine with intrinsic teleonomic direction to make economic incentives scale linearly.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @MikeAnissimov
@MikeAnissimov @DocCLAR There's no ahistorical answer to this -- capitalism is a process, inducing a tendency to economic rationality.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
@MikeAnissimov @DocCLAR Irrationalities are processed-out through arbitrage, very much including scaling anomalies. Spock wins in the end.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @MikeAnissimov
@MikeAnissimov @DocCLAR "The squeaky-clean economics of the 1970s" -- please tell me that's a joke.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @MikeAnissimov
@MikeAnissimov @DocCLAR Homo economicus is a teleonomic limit, selected towards by repetitive arbitrage, not a theoretical presupposition.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
@MikeAnissimov @DocCLAR If we knew enough about "the end" to be sure, this discussion wouldn't be happening.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.