@MikeAnissimov @DocCLAR You say the examples are rigorously unintelligible. Or is simply stacking up enough courtiers the answer?
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness
@MikeAnissimov @DocCLAR From crisp economic incentive structures to an impressionistic portrait of admirable government is not an advance.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @MikeAnissimov
@MikeAnissimov @DocCLAR Unless the urge for status scales linearly, this strikes me as more of a neat fencing move than a step forwards.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Outsideness
@MikeAnissimov @DocCLAR Capitalism is a social machine with intrinsic teleonomic direction to make economic incentives scale linearly.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @MikeAnissimov
@MikeAnissimov @DocCLAR There's no ahistorical answer to this -- capitalism is a process, inducing a tendency to economic rationality.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @MikeAnissimov
@MikeAnissimov @DocCLAR Capitalism is more highly evolved than paleolithic intuition, so fighting it is the royal road to the trash can.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
@MikeAnissimov @DocCLAR If serious about that remark, doesn't it amount to a complete repudiation of the artificial intelligence project?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @MikeAnissimov
@MikeAnissimov @DocCLAR Then that's the level to descent to. A promotion of capitalism is not a defense of "traditional economics" (at all).4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes - 1 more reply
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.