eased myself out of hangover by easing myself back into blogginghttps://reciprocalcontradiction.home.blog/2019/11/08/spatialization-of-time-temporalization-of-space/ …
-
-
Replying to @EBBerger
Do you think there's a difference between Postone's 'shearing pressure' and accelerationism's spironomic model of capitalist time?
3 replies 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @qdnoktsqfr @EBBerger
Spirodynamics with a wacky Hegelian hair-cut.
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likes -
... "The exploitation of human labor remains inscribed into the core of the system." -- What does 'human' really add that Capital could care about? ...
4 replies 1 retweet 15 likes -
... Capital's internal limit isn't "human something something" -- it's the biologically-abstractable horizon of absolute decoding-deterritorialization.
3 replies 2 retweets 21 likes -
... "Capital won't admit that it depends upon being mean to us!" -- It really doesn't.
1 reply 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @qdnoktsqfr
Not really making a claim about 'being mean' etc, more along the lines of D&G at their most paleoMarxist: "capitalism-in conformity with the movement by which it counteracts its own tendency-is continually drawing near the wall, but at the same time pushing the wall further away"
3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @EBBerger @qdnoktsqfr
Sure, nothing notably anthropomorphic in any of that.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Outsideness @qdnoktsqfr
ofc, if you deny the centrality of value in the Marxist sense to capital
like we've argued abt in the past, seems to me that capital is reliant on the human in the final instant, that this *is* the internal limit, and that 'beyond the wall' capital wouldn't be, well, capital3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @EBBerger @qdnoktsqfr
"Surplus value" is defined (rigorously) by Marx as the difference between productive output and reproductive input in an elementary economic unit (attributed commercial agency). ...
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
... The fact that monkeys then point and say "Hey, that's me!" doesn't count for much.
-
-
-
Certainly a good critique of the Proudhonian/utopian socialist vision of the laborer receiving the 'full value' of their labor -- Marx made a similar dismissal of attempts to apply the theory of surplus value to notions distributive justice
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.