Pretty amazing how people can be online for years and still believe in a "free market of ideas" as if successful persuasion and reasoned discussion were routine occurrences.
-
-
There are requirements for economic freedom and viable commercial activity and the dogmasphere is under no obligation to submit to them. Contracts and negotiation are very much forms of reasoned discussion, then there are matters of property rights and epistemic utility of greed.
-
The very term free market suggests the possibility of unfree markets but intellectual interaction doesn't rise to the level of even that in general society.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What do you think about a futarchy without democracy where the decision market optimizes for the market value of a nation? It is described in (option 2): http://www.overcomingbias.com/2019/08/ways-to-choose-a-futarchy-welfare-measure.html …
-
Would be good if I had any trust in the ability of whoever would be involved to adequately judge less tangential aspects that influence market value, whatever that means at the level of nation.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Is it accurate to suggest that markets compute the derivative of parametrised beliefs, as opposed to the dialectical model of 'agreement'?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.