My problem with Anton here is that I expect any principle of "justice" to degenerate unless it's locked-down as algorithmic government. https://americanmind.org/post/which-way-jester-man/ … ...
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @Outsideness
Are we going to program the perfect justice bot that can take full consideration the full real-time playback factual recording of the incident as well as every moment of the suspects life as well as all internalized thinking so that it can make the fairest most correct judgment?
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @atranquilnight @Outsideness
My problem with Anton, and political theorists in general, is they’re way more concerned with perfecting a system that theoretically will produce great people than actually wanting to have great people
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @atranquilnight
Isn't that the only practical way to have great people?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
How has every attempt to codify the Kingdom of God gone so far? Even a theory so refined as the constitutional balance of powers wasn’t safe from the trials of expediency or power-grabs or faction/interest group
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @atranquilnight
If you don't have code you have romance, which is far worse.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
I mean our system basically a reality show pageant of groups romancing the public at this point anyway, a code didn’t save it from that. The code only matters as much as its people follow and honor its way of things.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Hence "self-protective code". Sounds difficult, but Capital has been working at the problem for well-over a century now, and making remarkable advances.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.