TfE: Moral Logic, the Diversity of Nature, and the Nature of Diversity https://deontologistics.wordpress.com/2019/10/06/tfe-moral-logic-the-diversity-of-nature-and-the-nature-of-diversity/ … via @wordpressdotcom
-
Show this thread
-
" I think that there are two logical pillars of the moral universe: that ought implies can (normative pragmatism) and that the only valid inferences from is to ought are instrumental (normative anti-naturalism). This is the shape of the normative."
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
[...] "do not help yourself to normative metaphysics, lest you foreclose the possibility of normative discourse entirely, and the idea of personal autonomy along with it."
2 replies 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
@Outsideness Correct me if I'm wrong but I thought half the point of Patchwork is that since one can't just discourse away problems of normativity, instead absorb the problem transactionally, commercially. Isn't that perfectly compatible with those two "pillars"?4 replies 0 retweets 9 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @insurrealist
Hard for me to address the last question because the whole approach of dualist moral metaphysics looks so lost.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @insurrealist
... Is / ought orthogonalism and its manifold confusions (including 'naturalism' and 'anti-naturalism'). Intelligence Optimization diagonalizes out of these 'problems' entirely.
2 replies 2 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
Another thing is that one of these sure looks infinitely more tractable than the other.pic.twitter.com/fbh5rRk75i
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @insurrealist
Imagine being so shit at game theory that you fall back on "making a moral demand of someone else".
3 replies 1 retweet 8 likes
... "I might not know how to make a deal, but I sure as hell remember how to scold!"
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.