Listening to the @jmrphy chat on Neoabsolutism helped me recognize (again) what the fundamental axiom of ontological illiberalism is. ...
-
Show this thread
-
... The assumption that anarchic competition tends inevitably to full monopoly is absolutely basic to a huge range of statist ideologies. ...
3 replies 4 retweets 59 likesShow this thread -
... I find it hard to understand how this axiom got so deeply established, given that basic biological reality so dramatically disqualifies it. ...
5 replies 0 retweets 46 likesShow this thread -
... Nature is anarchic competition, and clearly doesn't tend to a monopolistic equilibrium. (Nor does world history or domestic economics, although the evidence is more open to controversy in those cases.) ...
6 replies 7 retweets 61 likesShow this thread -
... "War is God" says only this (more elegantly, of course). ...
1 reply 2 retweets 36 likesShow this thread -
... War is God, and it will not long tolerate a steward.
5 replies 6 retweets 53 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @Outsideness
The world tolerates a steward for an appreciable amount of time and the only way to break a monopoly is to create a new one
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @blackcat_1iii
Monopolies, whether political or economic, are never anywhere close to as strong as people think. ...
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
Buy they will be more likely to be replaced by a monopoly than multiple players in the long term?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Monopolies dominate narrow niches for short periods. The problem is completely over-blown.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.