The Left isn't wrong when it says Classical Liberals end up relying on fascists to do the dirty work for them, which says sad things about Classical Liberals, but not the sad things leftists concentrate on.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @Outsideness
Classical liberalism is just a rationalization for ascendant petty bourgeoisie. The elite doesn't believe it. The working class doesn't believe it. When things stop being ascendant, the same people immediately grow teeth... And as we all know, a middle class with teeth is facism
1 reply 1 retweet 16 likes -
Replying to @last_american_ @Outsideness
Which system do you like better, capitonationalism or two-share solution?https://orthosphere.wordpress.com/2017/02/10/completing-the-groundwork-of-a-feudal-hierarchy-of-sovereign-corporations/#comment-134004 …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Laneret1 @last_american_
"What then if each such sovereign corporation were owned by its citizens?" -- This seems like a bad turn (and actually ultimately soviet).
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @last_american_
All the Soviets owned shares of the government?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
A soviet is a workforce that owns its employer. Terrible incentives result. Formalism should be about hardening distinctions between owners, employers, and customers, not dissolving them.
-
-
"for the people by the people of the people" sounds a lot similar
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.