'Although [Kant's] critical philosophy is to the highest degree systematic—that is, self-coherent—it does not refer to anything real. Its transcendental concepts and principles, categories, ideas, etc. have no reality. ...
-
-
His point isn't incompatible with yours, though. Kant doesn't go far enough with critique, proscribing an account of ontogenesis by grounding production in epistemology.
-
He wants to put pressure on schematisation as the answer to Kant’s ‘Quid juris?’ question, and push the system towards genetic conditions of reality production, rather than conditions of possible experience.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.