(moreover, who gives a shit about humans)
-
-
Replying to @insurrealist @Outsideness
No one, hence the supposed opposition *of* humanity is engulfed, in its entirety, by the processes.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @meta_nomad @Outsideness
I'm talking about game semantics (and thus any identifiable parties in conflict, be they objects, processes, whatever), not people.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
-
It isn't oppositional, in so much as two football teams, engaged in *competition* in an individual game of football, are simultaneously engaged in propagation the (big game) sport of football, through the (small game) individual match itself.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
By the same moronic token nature is "fully negative" due to the inevitability of heat death and its (tragic and ironic) catalysis by way of intelligent behavior, in fact that's precisely the point that dissipative systems theory makes. https://homepages.eawag.ch/~matthebl/pdfs/Loudon_EE2016.pdf …pic.twitter.com/I0Jx6z4SoU
This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Can anything with an asymptote to zero (in this case free energy) ever be strictly 'negative'?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @insurrealist and
"Anything"?
pic.twitter.com/SFJgaOt3kP
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ungeometer @insurrealist and
Should have specified from a positive initial value but wasn't counting on galactic-scale pedantry.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @insurrealist and
(The refinement of galactic-scale pedantry is what mathematics has been about since at least Euclid.) Made to order:pic.twitter.com/m1daoZKuFq
3 replies 1 retweet 9 likes
That one's a little more convincing. (Not as a free energy decay graph though.)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.