Imagining history without a slave revolt in morals.https://catholicherald.co.uk/magazine/the-unredeemed-universe-of-game-of-thrones/ …
-
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness @_oumuamua
just out of curiosity, is the emergence of technocapital conceivable without that slave revolt in your opinion?
4 replies 0 retweets 38 likes -
Replying to @adornofthagn @_oumuamua
Horrifying as it is to admit this, it's the most interesting question I've ever been asked. ...
3 replies 0 retweets 39 likes -
... Which is to say: Probably weird games with slave morality look like part of the plan.
3 replies 0 retweets 20 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @_oumuamua
What does the prospective return of masters look like in that light?
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @adornofthagn @_oumuamua
Masters are a mistake. They end up sacrificing autonomy to shitty dialectics. It's negligence -- not dominance -- that's worth defending.
2 replies 1 retweet 17 likes -
So you don't believe that the see-saw of masters - negligence is an essential mechanism of the process?
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
I'd need to see more, to make sure there's no insidious Hegeling about.
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness @The_WGD and
You are an insidious Hegeling? Autonomy leads to masters and negligence. Pawn store owner buys an item at 45% or 55% value. What is his average buy % when his overall range is 10-97(99)%? Wouldn't matter if Hegel was never born and English didn't exist.
#DrowningPythagoras0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.