Masters are a mistake. They end up sacrificing autonomy to shitty dialectics. It's negligence -- not dominance -- that's worth defending.
-
-
yes btw I don't have any settled conclusions yet but do strongly suspect a reformulation Lockean property right based in the possibility of cryptographic proof of work may answer some of the main objections to the original
-
related to (tbqh partly prompted by) your comments on crypto as absolute time in the talk with Justin Murphy to wit, labor-time is unworkable for value theory mainly bc neither "labor" or "time" have much of any real existence or clear and non-ideological meaning
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
real neglect has never been tried, but hopefully it will be soon.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
in fact I might even want to say class exploitation under capitalism (surplus value) *is* a real thing *but* it's wholly a phenomenon of ability to arbitrage this need for third-party record-keeping and enforcement, & can't exist without it
-
the commodity-form doesn't intrinsically carry any reliable record of what inputs were committed to its production or who or where they came from, & the indeterminacy can be gamed by whoever controls the regime of property title issue and enforcement
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.