Has anyone ever done a "the Ccru was the source of the most extreme capitalist maniacs and also the most extreme anti-capitalist manics" piece, or would that be in some way too disturbing?
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness
A lot of people think it but other people don’t like to hear it said out loud. Esp if you add the caveat that cap / anticap doesn’t overlap right / left as conveniently as they’d like.
1 reply 0 retweets 27 likes -
Replying to @xenogothic @Outsideness
There was a discussion about this yesterday, actually -- re: Mark's comments about the inspiration for 'Post-Capitalist Desire", the class he was teaching when he died:pic.twitter.com/xrVwCHiLRE
2 replies 0 retweets 20 likes -
Replying to @xenogothic
"... closely exposed to" is something of a retrospective rationalization. He was wholly dissolved in the same (personally non-attributable) matrix.
1 reply 1 retweet 16 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
Would you put the post-ccru diversions down to retrospective rationalisations too?
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @xenogothic @Outsideness
If I want to get an overview about the CCRU capitalist perspective what apart from "fanged noumena" would I read?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
This is the obvious one:https://www.urbanomic.com/book/ccru-writings-1997-2003/ …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.