"At this moment, every single human population with an IQ over 95 has a fertility rate below replacement ..."https://bloodyshovel.wordpress.com/2019/01/21/tucker-carlsons-war-against-woke-capital-and-the-future-of-the-right/ …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @Outsideness
Why? Does natural selection dislike intelligence? Does intelligence correlate to something that isn't selected (being an insufferable twat, for example)? Was Sade right that man just aspires to homosexuality and the end of the species?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @silhoue77277930 @Outsideness
Population reduction =\= extinction. These populations respond to the selection pressures of postindustrial society through a regulation of reproduction. It's not a problem in itself.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MushiKachi @Outsideness
Idk. Outsideness’ other tweets betray a real preoccupation with a slow white genocide/extinction through repro regulation. If high intelligence led to post/industrial society, and these societies reduce repro, then it sounds to me like intelligence is culpable in the problem.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @silhoue77277930 @Outsideness
I think the fallacy here is assuming that decreased reproduction equals extinction, when it is more likely the population will stabilize at a lower level. People are not stopping to reproduce altogether, they are just more selective about it.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MushiKachi @silhoue77277930
... The problem is far less about population size than mean IQ. A global population of around a billion with a mean IQ of 130 would be just great. That's not where we're heading.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @MushiKachi
Why would a global pop of IQ 130 be just great? Have you been to a university before? Who will take out the trash? IQ may be predictive but it’s far from additive. Seems to me that natural selection may have a built-in aversion to intelligence.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @silhoue77277930 @MushiKachi
It's exactly when 120-IQ types are taking out the trash that there's some reason to think the species has a future.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @MushiKachi
I don’t think any 120 IQ types would consider that a future worth being part of though. That’s the whole problem. High IQ comes with lots of psychiatric and social/emotional issues that don’t result in best leadership or team-playing. Why it’s not being selected naturally.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @silhoue77277930 @MushiKachi
No one likes Malthusian pressure. Sadly, it's the only thing that supports a real progressive arrow in existence.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
... That's why, when humans learn to push it out, it climbs back in through the back window -- by turning the average human specimen into a dysfunctional moron. ...
-
-
... Quite amazing how much Malthusian pressure comes flooding back in once cognitive capacity drains out.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.