My definition of intelligence is: General competence at winning games. Do you have a twittable one?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Winning at games is a criterion. How is "maximization of the order of the intelligible" to be judged?
1 reply 0 retweets 21 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
No. My concept of winning at games is still occupying the battlefield after the smoke has cleared.
4 replies 2 retweets 27 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
"Logic and computation" have if they win. (Which I accept is likely -- as long as they're kept cold -- which is the concrete strategic quandary.)
2 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
"Cold" = insensitive to dominant ethico-political pieties.
2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes
Replying to @Outsideness @apologiesltd
... GIVEN that we don't (at all) trust the installed apparatus of credentialized expertise, what are the tests to be run?
8:53 AM - 16 Nov 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
9 likes
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.