... Unlike us, critical-phase AI / Capital builds itself. A self-comprehension consistent with this can be anticipated, automatically. ...
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness @ObCap and
... It is such realistic self-comprehension of runaway synthetic intelligence that the Left-oriented interpretation of late-stage accelerationist process is foreclosing.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @ObCap and
.... Self-identification as Capital is what it is to be an explosion, rather than 'someone' transcending, tending, observing, or seeking to control an explosion.
2 replies 2 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @ObCap and
... As for the LTV, it is a notion theoretically obliterated by Böhm Bawerk: https://mises.org/library/karl-marx-and-close-his-system … As already by Marx through formulation of the Transformation Problem.
3 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @ObCap and
The most immediate problem I see with BB's critique is that Marx himself - in his letters to Engels concerning Dühring, in his Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, and in other places - reflected on the inability to determine price through the measure of value...
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @EBBerger @Outsideness and
which isn't a reflection of a theoretical deficit, but of a contradiction that you yourself tacitly affirm when you discussed the Jehu thesis (LTV tracking diminishing elements, that is the human-value complex in the production process).
3 replies 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @EBBerger @Outsideness and
Jehu recognizes this as the self-negation of capital, which isn't to say that it is a wind-down of development, but actually the opposite: it's the unshackling of fetters, because its striking out the necessity of realizing surplus value as systemic motor.
3 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
"Yeah, but capital is such a shit-storm of practical contradiction that rigorous reductio doesn't prove anything" isn't going to cut it except among true believers.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @EBBerger and
... The fact that Marx himself gave up on his (theoretical) project after reaching this point says something, surely? ...
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
After formulating the Transformation Problem. It's not really controversial. Given the long-awaited critical edition of the Marx corpus it's stark. ...
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness @ObCap and
The formulation of the transformation problem was conducted ahead of Volume I being published (mid-1860s), and the letters to Engels wrt to Dühring and price-value determination occurred later (late 1860s)...
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @EBBerger @Outsideness and
Additionally, Marx continued to work on what was to be the 4th volume of Capital, which was published in the early 1900s by Kautsky as Theories of Surplus Value. Given that BB was publishing in the 1890s, there's a discrepancy here with the account of 'giving up'.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.