Nick Land’s Philosophy of Capital is Anti-Capitalist (3: Value Questions) https://disubunit22.wordpress.com/2018/11/08/nick-lands-philosophy-of-capital-is-anti-capitalist-3-value-questions/ … via @wordpressdotcom
-
-
The most immediate problem I see with BB's critique is that Marx himself - in his letters to Engels concerning Dühring, in his Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, and in other places - reflected on the inability to determine price through the measure of value...
-
which isn't a reflection of a theoretical deficit, but of a contradiction that you yourself tacitly affirm when you discussed the Jehu thesis (LTV tracking diminishing elements, that is the human-value complex in the production process).
- 10 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Are there modern economic books influenced by Mises/Austrians? I only know of Hoppe. Seems to be pretty rare way to view at economy.
-
That the Austrian School has been shunned by economists and academia is a validation of its worth, rather than a refutation.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@EBBerger please report inThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.