if it walks like money, and talks like money...
-
-
Thing is it isn't because it doesn't necessitate that you need to exchange something to receive the resources and products one needs to survive
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
yes, you're talking about free stuff for all. shame is that there's no free stuff. you can't just get there and get stuff, because there are costs involved in producing stuff. if these costs aren't being repayed in a close circuit, production collapses.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @wokeytliberal and
no storehouse will simply arise out of the blue if things aren't brought together. and nothing will bring them together if it isn't aiding their survival and expansion (i.e. if it isn't turning a profit)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Epic nae nae. I guess if currency didn't exist or wouldn't be recreated everything would just die... simple epic
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
barter works to a certain extent, but the double coincidence of wants quickly becomes a problem, and then something like currency has to arise.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Im not talking about barter lol
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
what are you talking about?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Barter is still exchange, so the hunt is for something more commie than that.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
"No, no, we call it 'free access to goods and resources' ..."
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness @parallaxoptics and
I guess primitive accumulation wasn't theft either nick......
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.